Road tests

The tests were performed using the full tank/full tank method, repeated several times, comparing the results obtained in similar weather conditions, or by continuous data collection, using Dash Command software, purchased from Palmer Performance Engineering (USA).

SUBARU FORESTER – EJ 20

• Constant speed
• Continuous data collection
• Dash Command software

Speed Revs Fuel consumption
km/h rpm l/100 Km
Classic EKOBIK Difference %
100 2600 8,3 7,9 0,4 4,82
130 3400 9,9 8,7 1,2 12,12
140 4100 12,8 10,9 1,9 14,84
150 4800 15 12,5 2,5 16,67
160 5500 19 16,5 2,5 13,16
Average 136 4080 13 11,3 1,7 12,32

NUBIRA – GM 356

• 2×6 tests, identical track
• Maximum load – 1300 km
• Each track with a length of 1300 km

 

Classic EKOBIK Difference %
Fara AC 12,5 10 2,5 20,00
AC 14 11,5 2,5 17,86
Media 13,25 10,75 2,50 18,93

SUBARU FORESTER – EJ 20

• 2×3 tests, identical track
• August/January (6000/3000 km)
• Maximum load

Classic EKOBIK Difference %
Fara AC 12,3 10,5 1,8 14,63
 AC 13,5 10,9 2,6 19,26
MEDIA 12,9 10,7 2,2 16,95

LOGAN 1,2 16v – LPG

• Highway
• Increasing speed interval
• Immediately after EKB installation

Speed Average revs Fuel consumption
km/h rpm l/100 km
Classic EKOBIK Difference %
36 – 50 2454 2,987 2,813 0,174 5,83
51 – 70 2364 3,246 3,199 0,047 1,45
71 – 130 3652 8,512 7,403 1,109 13,03
Average 2823,33 4,92 4,47 0,44 6,77